Benchmark – TMZvps.com – VM-1024 plan

Here is my benchmark test of my VM1024 plan at TMZvps.com and their L.A node, that provided me with this VPS for free. Thank you.

VPS1 – OpenVZ –  RAID10 –  VM-1024 plan

Server location: Los Angeles
Plan info: OpenVZ –1 GB RAM, 100 GB HDD, 1.5 TB BW.
Disk info: RAID10

Quote:
root@vps1 [~/UnixBench]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.42387 s, 314 MB/s
Quote:
root@vps1 [~/UnixBench]# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2012-07-21 01:00:53– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: â100mb.testâ100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 89.4M/s in 1.1s
Quote:
enchmark Run: Sat Jul 21 2012 00:02:05 – 00:30:20
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 16326480.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2473.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2725.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 659357.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 181989.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1637123.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1374606.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 126236.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5053.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4439.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 829.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1515918.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16326480.7 1399.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2473.2 449.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 2725.8 633.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 659357.1 1665.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 181989.7 1099.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1637123.2 2822.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1374606.4 1105.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 126236.2 315.6
Process Creation 126.0 5053.4 401.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4439.1 1046.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 829.2 1382.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1515918.6 1010.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 930.5————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Jul 21 2012 00:30:20 – 00:58:38
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 32383624.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4936.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5215.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 730881.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 203431.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2060523.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2705361.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 183803.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13636.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6571.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 764.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2585433.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 32383624.5 2774.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4936.3 897.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 5215.3 1212.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 730881.3 1845.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 203431.8 1229.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2060523.7 3552.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2705361.8 2174.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 183803.4 459.5
Process Creation 126.0 13636.3 1082.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6571.9 1550.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 764.3 1273.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2585433.5 1723.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1454.4

What do you think about the benchmark? Pretty good?