Benchmark- Prometeus.com – KVM5 plan

Here is my benchmark test of my KVM5 plan at Prometeus.com

VPS19 – KVM – RAID5 – KVM5 plan Server location: Italy.
Plan info: KVM -512 MB RAM, 25 GB RAID5 HDD, 2 TB BW.
Disk info: raid5 with 6 x 600GB SAS2 10K

Quote:
[root@vps19 UnixBench]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.85201 s, 376 MB/s
Quote:
[root@vps19 UnixBench]# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2012-07-20 23:21:05– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: â100mb.testâ100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 14.4M/s in 7.0s
Quote:
Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 20 2012 22:07:54 – 22:35:50
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 10046875.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1865.0 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1788.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 357271.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 90279.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 750429.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 588447.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 114021.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3900.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2689.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 579.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 544857.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10046875.2 860.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1865.0 339.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 1788.5 415.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 357271.3 902.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 90279.9 545.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 750429.8 1293.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 588447.4 473.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 114021.8 285.1
Process Creation 126.0 3900.7 309.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2689.0 634.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 579.9 966.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 544857.1 363.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 547.1————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 20 2012 22:35:50 – 23:03:51
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 20644308.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3683.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5091.0 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 424828.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 133551.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1119216.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1169877.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 227339.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13020.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4660.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 647.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 974343.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 20644308.7 1769.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3683.9 669.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 5091.0 1184.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 424828.3 1072.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 133551.9 807.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1119216.6 1929.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1169877.2 940.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 227339.5 568.3
Process Creation 126.0 13020.1 1033.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4660.1 1099.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 647.3 1078.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 974343.4 649.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 999.7

________