Benchmark – GetKVM.com – Medium plan – Hypervisor01 node

Here is my benchmark test of my Medium plan at  GetKVM.com on the Hypervisor01 node.

My first test was on their Hypervisor02 node, I will no see if their is a difference between thees two nodes. The first I can see is an over 150% increase in IO speeds.

Server location: Dusseldorf, Germany
*Medium plan/Hypervisor01* – €7.0/mo
Plan info: KVM – 512 MB RAM, 20GB , 750 GB BW.
Disk info: RAID10

[root@11 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 7.5644 s, 142 MB/s

[root@vps32 ~]# ioping . -c 5
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_11-lv_root): request=1 time=0.1 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_11-lv_root): request=2 time=0.4 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_11-lv_root): request=3 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_11-lv_root): request=4 time=0.5 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_11-lv_root): request=5 time=0.2 ms

— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_11-lv_root) ioping statistics —
5 requests completed in 4006.8 ms, 3329 iops, 13.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.3/0.5/0.1 ms

[root@vps32 ~]# ioping -R ioping-0.6

— ioping-0.6 (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_11-lv_root) ioping statistics —
2370 requests completed in 3000.4 ms, 3452 iops, 13.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.3/4.2/0.2 ms

[root@vps32 ~]# ioping -RL ioping-0.6

— ioping-0.6 (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_11-lv_root) ioping statistics —
1747 requests completed in 3002.4 ms, 1745 iops, 436.3 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.6/7.2/0.3 ms

 

[root@11 ~]# wget http://mirror.nl.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin
–2012-07-25 07:41:09–  http://mirror.nl.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin
Resolving mirror.nl.leaseweb.net… 2001:1af8:4030:1:0:dead:beef:cafe, 94.75.223.121
Connecting to mirror.nl.leaseweb.net|2001:1af8:4030:1:0:dead:beef:cafe|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 100000000 (95M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: â100mb.binâ

100%[==================================>] 100,000,000 9.73M/s   in 9.0s

CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6585.4 bogomips)

Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 25 2012 20:55:35 – 21:25:20

2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

 

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 20064716.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone 5364.9 MWIPS (11.6 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput 1770.7 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 671878.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 178316.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1924202.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput 1138417.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching 263063.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation 4921.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4187.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1291.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead 2396802.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

 

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 20064716.5 1719.3

Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5364.9 975.4

Execl Throughput 43.0 1770.7 411.8

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 671878.6 1696.7

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 178316.5 1077.4

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1924202.2 3317.6

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1138417.1 915.1

Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 263063.8 657.7

Process Creation 126.0 4921.5 390.6

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4187.4 987.6

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1291.0 2151.6

System Call Overhead 15000.0 2396802.0 1597.9

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 1105.8

 

————————————————————————

Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 25 2012 21:25:20 – 21:55:11

2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

 

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 39434563.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone 10708.0 MWIPS (11.8 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput 8755.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 996051.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 269021.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3101363.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput 2175387.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching 533868.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation 27819.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9802.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1296.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead 4181634.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

 

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39434563.3 3379.1

Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10708.0 1946.9

Execl Throughput 43.0 8755.5 2036.2

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 996051.8 2515.3

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 269021.8 1625.5

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3101363.4 5347.2

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2175387.9 1748.7

Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 533868.0 1334.7

Process Creation 126.0 27819.4 2207.9

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9802.2 2311.8

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1296.0 2160.0

System Call Overhead 15000.0 4181634.8 2787.8

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 2291.9